firing_rates.jpg

 Firing Rates Explained

Fully Automatic, Selective Fire, and Semi-Automatic

Reading Time: 10 min


Sustainable, effective rapid-fire is the key to scalable lethality, and is the motivating reason for everything that makes an assault rifle what it is. Those things are all interconnected and they both augment each other, and hinder each other. Rapid-firing is one that demands a few things from a gun: a firing and loading mechanism that makes it possible, an ammunition source and resupply method that makes it sustainable, and a design and chambering that supports both and allows for effective shooting.

The more “rapid” the fire that is wanted from a gun, and the more sustainable and effective the shooting needs to be, the more the gun will need to be purpose-built to support it, and the more advantage there is in military-optimized rifles. This is often missed or hidden component of the risk potential of civilian assault rifles, particularly in the hands of mass shooters.


Rapid-Fire in a Few Flavours: Full Auto, Semi-Automatic Fire, and Selective-Fire.

The two primary modes operation for rapid-fire guns like assault rifles are fully automatic and semi-automatic. The difference between them is actually smaller than one might think, and stems from just a few physical design changes in the weapons.

Functionally, both are capable of rapid-fire, one is just usually a bit more rapid than the other, and they are far more similar than not. The design features that distinguish these two modes are worth understanding — just a little bit —  because they are the only things that differentiate prohibited military assault rifles from the civilian versions, and the bare fact that the difference is very small matters. A lot.

These firing modes are are rooted in mechanical differences which we will see in a second are literally quite small, but in application there is significant overlap, and both firing modes can exist in the same gun, and often do. The difference really comes down to just one thing: how the gun handles repeated shots.


Repeating The Firing Process:

Different guns achieve these firing modes in different ways, but the broad strokes are the same and the details really don’t matter here. In the end, full and semi-automatic differ in how they handle just one thing: how they get in the way of repeat firing, not how they create it.

Both types of guns can be loaded with more than 1 bullet at a time (which come from the magazine). The bullet gets loaded into the firing chamber, and then the gun is cocked so that pulling the trigger will release the firing pin and initiate the explosion that fires the projectile part of the cartridge.

With any gun, once a bullet is fired there is a process that has to happen before the next shot can be fired:

1. Trigger is pullled.

2. Firing mechanism is engaged to fire the loaded (“chambered”) bullet.

3. Eject the spent shell casing (the “leftover” of the cartridge).

4. Load another bullet into the chamber (from the magazine).

5. Cock the weapon to prepare to fire again.

In older, and many other styles of modern firearms too, each of these steps is a manual process.

What makes a gun “automatic” is that this process is done “by” the gun, and it starts with the first trigger pull on a loaded and cocked “ready to fire” weapon. The first setup, loading, cocking, and pulling the trigger is all on the shooter.  After that, the gun takes over in different ways.

With automatic type guns this process gets powered by harnessing excess energy created by the explosion that propels the just-fired bullet. The energy comes from the same action/reaction impulse that creates weapon recoil, or it comes via things like the pressure created from expanding gases from the gun powder detonation.  The gun basically just hijacks what would otherwise just be wasted energy and uses it to make firing again faster and more efficient. Much.

Here is a nice little animation that shows how it works:

The difference between full-automatic and semi-automatic modes is in how that process is handled - either once per trigger pull, or repeatedly until the trigger is released. That’s it.  


Semi-Automatic

Semi-automaticis the civilian available option, and is the one featured in the animation above. Here that cycle runs from 1-5 and then stops. The gun fires one bullet per pull of the trigger, basically this can be done as fast as you can manage, one shot at at time. The process looks like this:

1. Trigger is pullled.

2. Firing mechanism is engaged to fire the loaded (“chambered”) bullet.

3. Eject the spent shell casing (the “leftover” of the cartridge).

4. Load another bullet into the chamber (from the magazine).

5. Cock the weapon to prepare to fire again.

5. Firing mechanism is disengaged or “blocked” until trigger is released.

The big thing here is that after the first shot, at the end of the cycle (#5), there is a break in the continuous flow and the shooter must physically release the trigger before the gun is able to start again at #1.

Non-gun people tend to think, and the gun lobby really wants you to think, that this is equal to slow.  It’s not, not by a long shot, and there are many good examples on Youtube, and in pop culture that demonstrate just how slow it ain’t.

A master of effective semi-automatic rapid-fire. (John Wick Chapter 3 / Thunder Road Pictures. )

A master of effective semi-automatic rapid-fire. (John Wick Chapter 3 / Thunder Road Pictures. )

Semi-automatic fire can be as slow and methodical as you like, but rapid semi-auto is often considered to be around 45-60 rpm, for an average shooter. But that is not actually a challenging speed -  because what is often cited there is actually an effective rate of fire.

The effective rate of a gun is different from it’s maximum, and it is less precise because it just means as fast as you can go while still being pretty sure you are actually hitting your target. So it includes aiming/re-aiming and maintaining target alignment, which means that things about the gun itself have a huge impact, but so do things about individual shooters. Effective firing rates can vary quite a bit more from person-to-person than from gun-to-gun.

Still, 45-60 rpm is actually just average, and not trying for burst-type shooting.

Really fast shooters can fire pretty effectively at multiple targets at a rate of 5-8 rounds per second - which is more like 300 rpm. That is also usually done as "double-taps" or 2 quick shots per target , and is far more than the 45-60 of a methodical sustained rapid-fire. And this is just regular shooting, there are tricks and modifications covered elsewhere that can ramp that up enormously.

Basically, with a semi-automatic, after the first trigger pull the gun fires and then cycles through the process outlined above and is then ready to fire again, but doesn’t. This happens extremely quickly, but there is a physical block put in place that forces the shooter to manually intervene before the next shot can be fired. In other words: the process is interrupted to create semi-automatic fire. When you don’t, you get fully-automatic.


Fully-Automatic

Fully automatic, or "full-auto", or sometimes “automatic weapons” are the guns that keep shooting as long as the trigger is held back, until the gun is empty. The difference is there is no step #6, which means that after the first shot you don’t need #1 anymore either. The gun will cycle through steps 2-5 repeatedly until the shooter releases the trigger, or it runs out of bullets.

This happens at incredible speed due to the high energy from the firing of the bullet. How rapidly it does this is called the “cyclic rate” and is measured in rounds per minute or “rpm”. For example, the M16/M4 rifles fire between 700-950 rpm. That will empty a standard high-capacity 30-round magazine in bit more than 2 seconds if the shooter doesn’t release the trigger. Definitely rapid.

This is typically much, much faster than the effective rate, which is discussed elsewhere in more detail but boils down to recoil effects.

Everybody knows what full-auto fire looks like:

Terminator Genisys / Orion Pictures.

Terminator Genisys / Orion Pictures.

It’s a rule that full-auto fire must be accompanied by screaming.

Full-auto isn't just one speed though - it's just one pull of the trigger and the gun keeps shooting, but how fast depends on different things, and varies a bit. It is always snappy, but can range pretty widely with the type of gun, but also just with the ammunition type. That's why the cyclic rate for the M16 is both estimated, and given as a range. The explosive characteristics of different types of ammunition create different cyclic rates, some faster, some slower.

Without mechanical intervention, the full-auto thing would more naturally be a runaway process; basically emptying whatever ammo the gun has with every pull of the trigger. This was and is an outcome of mechanical failures on automatic weapons, and a lot of design improvements over the years have been geared to making that less likely to happen.

So the basic design of automatic weapons creates a potential for a run-away shooting process and full-auto weapons include the ability to interrupt that process by releasing the trigger. Semi-automatics necessitate the interruption.

By including or changing a few parts they make it vastly easier to limit the rate of fire to one methodical shot at a time, or anywhere in between.


Selective-Fire:

To get a semi-automatic weapon you can take a full-auto gun and —basically - put some limiters on it, but it is otherwise the same process, same mechanics, same everything. This means it’s quite possible to have both modes on one gun, and that is in fact extremely common - far and away the most common approach on military weapons. If a weapon has the option of switching between full-auto and semi-auto modes it is called a selective-fire weapon. This is also the most common way people will refer to fully automatic-capable weapons - what many think of as "machine guns”, like the M16, or the AK47 (probably the two best known examples).

A selective-fire AR-platform lower receiver, currently in full-auto mode.

A selective-fire AR-platform lower receiver, currently in full-auto mode.

Here’s a video that shows the selective-fire function, and it also helps show the difference between full and semi-automatic fire clearly (you can watch it all, but the part of interest for this point is just the first 5-10 seconds). Note that the guy in the video is not necessarily firing as fast as he can in semi-automatic, that isn’t the point of this particular video, but we'll come back to that very soon anyway.

So, just to summarize and avoid some possible confusion: you may hear people refer to what a lot of the public thinks of as “machine guns” as: automatic weapons, fully-automatic weapons, or selective-fire weapons. And what people may think of as “machine gun fire” may be called full-auto fire, or selective fire (or even “cyclic fire”, but that rarely outside of military jargon). What you will never hear from the gun literate is “machine gun” unless they really mean a machine gun - which is something specific, and different from an assault rifle.

One does not simply call it a "machine gun". (Lord of the Rings/ New Line Cinema)

One does not simply call it a "machine gun". (Lord of the Rings/ New Line Cinema)


Why Those Tiny Differences and Military “Style” Actually Matter:

Now you understand what these firing modes are, and what the names mean. Hopefully this will help you understand the commonly accepted distinction between military and civilian assault weapons. That is a realy distinction, as far as it goes, but do not mistake that for the difference between guns capable of highly scalable lethality, and those that aren’t - because that is flat out bullshit. Both are capable, largely because of the vast amount of overlap in just about every other aspect of the weapons.

To whit, selective fire is the only functional distinction between poster-child guns in the feature image: the civilian AR-15 and the military M16. Colt very helpfully makes this point in one of their old ads:

Colt ad from the 1980’s (I think 1986? It's hard to read the date there and it’s the only version I could find)

Colt ad from the 1980’s (I think 1986? It's hard to read the date there and it’s the only version I could find)

Understanding how small the difference really is between civilian and military assault rifles goes a long way to explaining why they have so much overlap in killing power. It's literally that one function, and a few parts:

"The AR-15 and M16 parts are very similar, and unless you know what you're looking for, would most likely not notice. Many of the AR-15 parts have been made by modifying the plentiful M16 parts. Colt has made a number of modifications over the years to their AR-15 lower receivers to minimize the possibility of "misplaced" M16 parts, but on most non-Colt rifles, M16 parts will fit in place of the semi-auto parts.”

- AR15.com -

And physically, the difference in the parts are tiny. Literally. Here are the key parts that differ, and how:

Images: AR15.com

Images: AR15.com

And for those who are curious why they were “too ignorant” to tell the difference between military and civilian weapons, here is where you actually find them on the gun:

Source: TC-3-22.9 Rifle and Carbine: Headquarters, Department of the Army

Source: TC-3-22.9 Rifle and Carbine: Headquarters, Department of the Army

It may be a bit hard to tell from the diagram, but you may note that the differences are not on the gun - all of the parts are inside the gun. Really, only the selector switch will show external differences, and you need to see the gun fairly closely to tell from that.  It's easy to see why non-gun people could be confused about knowing the "really" dangerous military guns from the oh-so-much safer civilian ones.

So those 5 or-so different internal parts, out of somewhere between 150-200 total parts, do not create a magical distinction in terms of how deadly these guns are. What they do is basically allow the shooter to toggle off and on a "max speed" mode for rapid firing of the weapon. Everything else about the gun (98% or so) is fully geared and optimized to support the functionality of rapid-firing.

Again, Colt helpfully laid it out in that ad above:

“All the ruggedness and performance of the M16A2 weapon system is engineered into every AR-15A2 rifle. With the exception of the semi-automatic parts, every component on every AR-15A2 is manufactured to the same blueprint as the corresponding component on the M16A2." (emphasis mine)

And:

"The same production line and procedures. The same metallurgy. The same materials. The same skilled hands guiding assembly and finish. The same accuracy and function standards. The same everything.” (emphasis original)

So now think back to the cycle of 4 functions that happen with both full and semi-automatic fire, we can summarize it:

  1. Fire

  2. Eject

  3. Load

  4. Cock

Everything about the gun that makes it physically capable of doing that at full-auto speed is built into the gun. That functionality is just inhibited at one point, but fully supported everywhere else.

You can reasonably say that the selective-fire controls don't add anything, they actually inhibit the full-automatic cycling. So all you really need to do is remove that barrier, or find a way to make that trigger go a lot faster, and everything else is already in place. 

This is really important when looking at the elements of scalable lethality, because it’s not just based on rapid-fire, it demands sustainable and effective fire too. The gun needs to be optimized and designed to provide all of that  - and a gun that is purpose built for military applications of full-auto fire is going to have all that is needed isn’t it? 

This is why military "style” assault weapons is a misleading term. We should think of them as military optimized weapons. They have been engineered and highly refined to be more reliable for sustained rapid-fire. They don’t overheat or jam as easily or often, and are easier to handle than guns that are designed for more sporting/hunting purposes, where rapid-fire is neither needed nor wanted. 

Guns that are not purpose-built for rapid-fire will break down and fail where military weapons will keep going with far less problems - because that is what they are made for. This is a reason why assault rifles are used so much in mass shootings: they are more reliable for the task, and that is directly a result of their being engineered to achieve and work well with even full-auto firing rates, and in the most extreme and varied conditions.

The only thing a killer has to do is remove or circumvent those little barriers and everything about these guns is ready to go as fast and far the killer wants. Those barriers are negligible.

As it turns out the barriers barely matter anyway.  The only real question is how fast is fast enough for effective rapid-fire? How much does full-auto even matter? Is there a speed that is too slow? Too fast? The answer to those in order, are: not very, not much, no, and yes.

If you are still curious, I talk about all that and the functional applications and implications in greater detail in the WTF Are They?,  Scalable Lethality, and The 3- Part Recipe for Scalable Lethality articles.


Summary

Semi-automatic and fully-automatic (and selective-fire, which covers both) are both modes of firing for assault rifles, and from a functional perspective the difference between them is one of degrees, between fast, and faster. Both are capable of sustained and effective rapid-fire.

Military and civilian assault rifles have one clear bright line of distinction — an inhibitory mechanism — but those mechanical bits are the only place the difference is binary. Functionally, how the guns are used and how they can be used, is far less clearly defined. This is partly because of the limited effectiveness of shooting too fast, and the huge range of overlap between effective high-speed semi-automatic firing and fully automatic firing, in terms of both rate of fire, and situations where they are useful.

It is important to know all this because military-optimized weapons are not just guns that “look” like military rifles, they are guns that are capable of sustaining the exact same kind of fire that is used in combat and this makes them more than able to scale up to incredible lethality in the context of a mass shooting.


Thoughts about the article? Feel free to drop me a line.